This was the first of the videos that started a trend of sex education videos in the early 1990s . I guess the idea behind it was for liberated women to go into a high street store and buy it without any type of guilt or inhibition , but no doubt the main buyer market was teenage boys and dirty old men
THE LOVERS GUIDE is groundbreaking in the fact that it publicised that the couples involved were real life partners but this is slightly dishonest , yes the main couple featured Wendy and her husband were indeed a real life couple who'd been married several years but there was some public controversy that at least one of the couples Kathryn ( The gorgeous brunette ) and Marino ( The well buffed geezer with a ponytail ) had never met one another until they appeared on set where they had unprotected sex for the camera . For a video that self righteously dedicates segments to safe sex it is rather hypocritical
Seeing as it's for education purposes and not pornography as such there's limits as to what can be shown but as a sex education video it's not uninformative though I doubt if you'll be gasping " I never knew that "
As a footnote the main couple featured became something of sexual problem agony aunts in the British press - Until it was revealed that Wendy's husband had a serious heart condition which put a stop to sex . I almost felt sorry for this couple who confessed that they used to make love as often as ten times a day but now couldn't make love once a day because it was too dangerous . My small amount of sympathy soon vanished when shortly afterwards the couple split up and raced off to the gutter press in order to dish the dirt on one another to the highest bidder .
这没想到这么烂，再精美的服化道也掩盖不了剧本的弱智，不知道是原著小说的弱还是改编的弱，种种不符基本逻辑、违背常识的弱智场景看得让人尴尬要死（您干嘛不再喊大声点“我要刺杀希特勒”），“夏洛特小姐”和老戏骨们也救不了这烂戏，俩男主角除了长得好看演技也是令人尴尬，一个面瘫一个“马景涛”。。。
烟盒明明还有还要“shall we share?”“I'd miss you”深情的“goodbye”看得俺老基动了，Jannis大漂亮分分钟都是hugo boss走秀啊，明明是主角为嘛演员表排老后呢
就个人而言
张伯伦的确延长了二战爆发的和平时间 历史修正主义 revisionist改变不了张伯伦相信多边主义 外交可以解决争端 英法退出历史舞台 打穷了苏联打富了美国
影片中张伯伦的形象很高大，他不惜牺牲自己声誉，拯救天下苍生。但是无论张伯伦动机如何，这都不是绥靖合理的理由。为张伯伦绥靖喝彩的人，是不是不知道捷克斯洛伐克代表卑微命运，他们只能在会议室门口等着；是不是不知道捷克斯洛伐克最终被德国吞并
这题材定位有点尬，不过演的不错，就完全能看下去
时代电影，美化绥靖政策啊，关键也就缓了一年啊，英国了准备了，德国人也更有准备了啊，那会德国还没有直接硬刚英法的实力啊
We don’t choose the times we live in, the only choice we have is how we respond.
也是一种解读吧，都是政坛老油子的术语和演绎，你要利息人家要本金，看谁的眼头更高一些了…主角们到底在其中体现了什么价值这个逻辑太薄弱了
除了杰瑞米艾恩斯的表演外，这部电影可以说毫无是处
关于慕尼黑协定的再思考，知道希特勒的野心却在舆论中无法做出更多举动，号称牺牲自己的名誉争取备战时间却其实助长了纳粹的飞扬跋扈，杰瑞米艾恩斯饰演的张伯伦可谓入木三分，而两位主角不同的形象其实也是那个根本无法预知未来的时代的不同群体的反映
稍显冗长，但保罗握枪犹豫那一段确实让人心跳加速，甚至按下了暂停键缓一缓。张伯伦的选角很合适。但人物形象整体还是太过于扁平，比如张伯伦的形象似乎非常完美。
二战前一年德国和英国的众生态，顺便从另一个角度重新认识（吹捧洗白）张伯伦。是好题材，但为了展现这段历史而设的几个虚拟角色性格都很扁平，演得也不咋地，其实除了张伯伦，其他几个政治人物也被描写得很脸谱化，很乏味。
电影情节不错，不过小说改编的剧情只能认定为虚构历史，片尾对虚构历史进行主观评价非常不可取，似乎是虚构事件与历史实际发生别无二致，这样极其误导观众，对虚构历史的盲目崇尚，对真实历史产生不切实际的评价，丧失以史为鉴的作用，片尾就打上本片参照历史，剧情基本虚构会好多了，四星给电影本身，不对电影中任何历史真实人物进行认识
谍战情节漏洞太多 莫名其妙，看起来过于紧绷的主演，或仿佛走错片场的配角，从1917 唐顿庄园到巴比伦柏林 包豪斯时代，反正完全没法入戏，还有元首的选角是故意搞笑的吧。。。
明知道结局却还是对小人物抱着一丝注定落空的希望。
导演竟然不是gay？！
很特別的視角, 講述張伯倫曲線救國的故事, 不知道真正過程是真是假, 只有當事人才能知道了
张伯伦的功与过通过两个小人物的热血鲁莽的政治行动又被审视了一次
强国分瓜弱国默，人微言轻逆势难。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
